[X3D-Public] containerField is should or must ? largeattributes; compression

Joe D Williams joedwil at earthlink.net
Tue Aug 24 10:00:34 PDT 2010




>> actually there is no 'count' field in fieldValue so that should
>> be omitted entirely.

> Since the whole proposal was created to increase speed and decrease 
> temporary memory usage we (the discussion group at that time) 
> borrowed the count-field from the collada spec.

> This is optional but very useful for

I agree with optional anywhere <fieldValue is used. and with undefined 
behaviors if count gives different value than is actually found, or 
when different from other 'related' fields, like points and colors and 
normals, etc.

> which might have efficient memory management.
Especially while working with huge-datasets

> regards
> johannes

>> all the best, Don

Thanks,
Joe 




More information about the X3D-Public mailing list