[X3D-Public] containerField is should or must ? largeattributes; compression
Joe D Williams
joedwil at earthlink.net
Tue Aug 24 10:00:34 PDT 2010
>> actually there is no 'count' field in fieldValue so that should
>> be omitted entirely.
> Since the whole proposal was created to increase speed and decrease
> temporary memory usage we (the discussion group at that time)
> borrowed the count-field from the collada spec.
> This is optional but very useful for
I agree with optional anywhere <fieldValue is used. and with undefined
behaviors if count gives different value than is actually found, or
when different from other 'related' fields, like points and colors and
normals, etc.
> which might have efficient memory management.
Especially while working with huge-datasets
> regards
> johannes
>> all the best, Don
Thanks,
Joe
More information about the X3D-Public
mailing list