[X3D-Public] Historical question

[Tony Parisi]

Here's the reference:

http://www.web3d.org/x3d/specifications/vrml/ISO-IEC-14772-VRML97/part1/concepts.html#4.7

Tony

On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Tony Parisi <tparisi at gmail.com> wrote:

> exposedField was definitely in the VRML spec.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Dave A <dave at realmofconcepts.com> wrote:
>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I've just started using FreeWRL and was surprised that it was rejecting
>> scripts with 'exposedField' on them. Now, I've used Contact, Cortona,
>> Flux/Vivaty, and Instant Player, and they all support this. But the FreeWRL
>> guys point out that 'exposedField' is not in the VRML spec (it is in the X3D
>> spec but as 'inputOutput').
>>
>> So, how did this 'exposedField' come to be, when, and if it's in so many
>> popular browsers, how is it not in at least an Amendment, and (to the
>> FreeWRL folks), why not implement it there?
>>
>> Thanks for any enlightenment you may provide.
>>
>> Dave A.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> X3D-Public mailing list
>> X3D-Public at web3d.org
>> http://web3d.org/mailman/listinfo/x3d-public_web3d.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Tony Parisi                             tparisi at gmail.com
> CTO at Large                         415.902.8002
> Skype                                     auradeluxe
> Follow me on Twitter!             http://twitter.com/auradeluxe
>
>
>


-- 
Tony Parisi                             tparisi at gmail.com
CTO at Large                         415.902.8002
Skype                                     auradeluxe
Follow me on Twitter!             http://twitter.com/auradeluxe
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://web3d.org/pipermail/x3d-public_web3d.org/attachments/20110606/c4f1013e/attachment.html>