[x3d-public] Proposal amendment: implicit fields in x3dv (Mantis 976)

[Roy Walmsley]

Yves,

I have now created Mantis issue 976 to capture this interesting suggestion.
I have included your original proposal, the amendment, and the further
comment below.

Thanks for your suggestions, which are always welcome.

Roy

-----Original Message-----
From: x3d-public [mailto:x3d-public-bounces at web3d.org] On Behalf Of Yves
Piguet
Sent: 30 August 2016 15:50
To: doug sanden <highaspirations at hotmail.com>
Cc: X3D Graphics public mailing list <x3d-public at web3d.org>
Subject: Re: [x3d-public] Proposal amendment: implicit fields in x3dv

Le 30 août 2016 à 16:30, doug sanden a écrit :

>> The containerField of a PROTO is the containerField of the first node of
its body.
> You sure this will work for protos with multiple rootnodes? 

Yes, I think so. Have you found a counterexample? Should there really be a
problem, one could add an exception. Implicit field names would be a
convenience, nothing more.

It shouldn't be different than the default containerField attribute in XML
encoding, but I can't find where it's specified for prototypes.

Thanks,

Yves


_______________________________________________
x3d-public mailing list
x3d-public at web3d.org
http://web3d.org/mailman/listinfo/x3d-public_web3d.org