[x3d-public] Fascinating Discussion on WebVR List

[Joe D Williams]

an echo ...

"VRML didn't fail because it had a scene graph,
it failed because it was twenty years too early."
Tony
https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/web-vr-discuss/2016-October/001755.html

An important part of this seems to be discussion of VR needing a 
scenegraph that the html browser DOM doesn't have.
The javascriptmeisters say don't bother with a scenegraph in the 
browser, we can handle it in .js.

Joe


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Leonard Daly" <Leonard.Daly at realism.com>
To: "X3D Public" <x3d-public at web3d.org>
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2016 3:30 PM
Subject: [x3d-public] Fascinating Discussion on WebVR List


> There has been (and continues to be) a fascinating discussion from a
> breakout at the W3C VR Workshop on the WebVR list. You can read the
> thread starting with the first message at
> https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/web-vr-discuss/2016-October/001735.html.
>
> The discussion is about the future of 3D development both low-level 
> APIs
> and high-level scene graphs. There is a recommendation that a W3C
> Community Group be formed to handle the discussion. I have provided
> WebVR with the URL.
>
>
> -- 
> *Leonard Daly*
> 3D Systems & Cloud Consultant
> LA ACM SIGGRAPH Chair
> President, Daly Realism - /Creating the Future/
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


> _______________________________________________
> x3d-public mailing list
> x3d-public at web3d.org
> http://web3d.org/mailman/listinfo/x3d-public_web3d.org
>