[x3d-public] [x3dom-users] CSS bindings for <x3d> ...</x3d>

[Joe D Williams]

> Wireframes? Basic geometry and transforms without color? Images?

Great, I hadn't even included those types oof display styles.
Seems like top browsers will offer choices of wireframe, points, 
smooth, flat, etc.
That would be on top of indivdual properties of appearance, for 
instance.
I would tihink choices like wireframe and points would not be added to 
the basic node idl, but instead only offered as a css class option.

In standard html css it is possible to change an image (except 
background).

Thanks,
Joe


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Carlson" <yottzumm at gmail.com>
To: "Joe D Williams" <joedwil at earthlink.net>
Cc: <x3dom-users at lists.sourceforge.net>; "John Carlson" 
<john.carlson3 at sbcglobal.net>; <x3d-public at web3d.org>
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2017 8:14 AM
Subject: Re: [x3d-public] [x3dom-users] CSS bindings for <x3d> 
...</x3d>


I think we should figure out what we want to show without styles and 
that
will be the dividing line between what's styled and what's not.

Wireframes? Basic geometry and transforms without color? Images?

On Feb 6, 2017 11:00 AM, "Joe D Williams" <joedwil at earthlink.net> 
wrote:

> ...closing-the-gap-between-html-and-webgl/
>>
>
> yes, in this case the gap between webgl and html is the html dom. 
> The
> efforts are how to get webgl functionalities into a state where 
> features of
> webgl can be integrated into the dom (or any event-driven 
> scenegraph), An
> example is touchsensor where the javascript platform gives access to 
> webgl
> functionalities and communicates with the html using dom interfaces.
>
> This is essentially what x3d does - adding author support for basic 
> stuff
> like an object model for the scenegraph structures and a timestamped
> cascade event system regardless whether the underlying system is 
> webgl or
> ogl; Sometimes when people are inventing this stuff, I hope they 
> would look
> at some x3d. I'm sure the x3dom and cobweb and other great 
> javascript
> supporting the ongoing intergration of x3d and html gibes some 
> hints.
>
> The point with css is that it is a very convenient way to control 
> certain
> aspects of the scene. And, the current css with html shows that it 
> is
> possible to rebuild an html browser to do css operations using 
> mostly
> standard dom interfaces.
>
> Thanks and Best,
> Joe
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Carlson" <
> john.carlson3 at sbcglobal.net>
> To: "Joe D Williams" <joedwil at earthlink.net>
> Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2017 10:06 AM
> Subject: Re: [x3dom-users] CSS bindings for <x3d> ...</x3d>
>
>
> Here's one take on the issue: http://learningthreejs.com/blo
>> g/2013/04/30/closing-the-gap-between-html-and-webgl/
>>
>>
>> On Feb 5, 2017 12:27 PM, John Carlson <john.carlson3 at sbcglobal.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  I think the issue may be, how well is CSS integrated with 
>> canvas/webgl.
>> Â  Do we have to provide another implementation?
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> x3d-public mailing list
> x3d-public at web3d.org
> http://web3d.org/mailman/listinfo/x3d-public_web3d.org
>