[x3d-public] Volume rendering spec.

GPU Group gpugroup at gmail.com
Wed Jan 10 13:41:19 PST 2018


Looks like freewrl agrees with you Andreas: freewrl has an orphan node
called CompositeVolumeStyle -never tested or programmed- with same fields
as ComposedVolumeStyle, and both lacking 'ordered' field. (ordered treated
as false).


On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:01 AM, Andreas Plesch <andreasplesch at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Before I submit a spec. comment I would like to explore if there are more
> appropriate resolutions to the following issues:
>
>
> Table 41.7 ( http://www.web3d.org/documents/specifications/
> 19775-1/V3.3/Part01/components/volume.html#t-supportlevels ) lists
> CompositeVolumeStyle in level 3. However, a style with this name is not
> defined in the Volume Rendering component. There is a ComposedVolumeStyle
> but this style is a level 2 style in the table.
>
>
> A proposed resolution is to remove the row which lists
> CompositeVolumeStyle from Table 41.7
>
> Table 41.7 refers to an ordered field in the support column for
> ComposedVolumeStyle. However, the node signature at section 41.4.4 (
> http://www.web3d.org/documents/specifications/19775-1/V3.3/Part01/
> components/volume.html#ComposedVolumeStyle ) does not have an ordered
> field.
>
> A proposed resolution is to replace the comment in the support column for
> ComposedVolumeStyle with 'All fields fully supported'.
>
> Alternatively, it is possible that there used to be an ordered field and
> that it should be reintroduced. Then level 3 would support this field.
>
> Andreas
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> x3d-public mailing list
> x3d-public at web3d.org
> http://web3d.org/mailman/listinfo/x3d-public_web3d.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://web3d.org/pipermail/x3d-public_web3d.org/attachments/20180110/9fa67ce8/attachment.html>


More information about the x3d-public mailing list