[x3d-public] [x3d] X3DUOM and validation of dangling references?

[John Carlson]

More explanation: These reference in V3.0 of X3DUOM refer to nothing present:

Thanks for any clarification.

$ egrep 'X3DVertexAttributeNode|FogCoordinate' X3dUnifiedObjectModel-3.0.xml|grep acceptable
                   acceptableNodeTypes="X3DVertexAttributeNode"/>
                   acceptableNodeTypes="FogCoordinate"/>
                   acceptableNodeTypes="X3DVertexAttributeNode"
                   acceptableNodeTypes="FogCoordinate"
                   acceptableNodeTypes="X3DVertexAttributeNode"/>
                   acceptableNodeTypes="FogCoordinate"/>
                   acceptableNodeTypes="X3DVertexAttributeNode"
                   acceptableNodeTypes="FogCoordinate"
                   acceptableNodeTypes="X3DVertexAttributeNode"
                   acceptableNodeTypes="FogCoordinate"
                   acceptableNodeTypes="X3DVertexAttributeNode"
                   acceptableNodeTypes="FogCoordinate"
                   acceptableNodeTypes="X3DVertexAttributeNode"/>
                   acceptableNodeTypes="FogCoordinate"/>
                   acceptableNodeTypes="X3DVertexAttributeNode"
                   acceptableNodeTypes="FogCoordinate"
                   acceptableNodeTypes="X3DVertexAttributeNode"
                   acceptableNodeTypes="FogCoordinate"
                   acceptableNodeTypes="X3DVertexAttributeNode"
                   acceptableNodeTypes="FogCoordinate"


Maybe these could be added without fields to X3DUOM?

$ svn diff œ| egrep FogCoordinate"|"X3DVertexAttributeNode
+      <AbstractNodeType name="X3DVertexAttributeNode">
+         <InterfaceDefinition specificationUrl="http://www.web3d.org/documents/specifications/19775-1/V3.3/Part01/components/shaders.html#X3DVertexAttributeNode"
+      <ConcreteNode name="FogCoordinate">
+         <InterfaceDefinition specificationUrl="http://www.web3d.org/documents/specifications/19775-1/V3.3/Part01/components/enveffects.html#FogCoordinate">Sent from Mail for Windows 10

We could discuss adding parameters for version.  Did we already discuss this?

John
From: John Carlson
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2018 5:43 PM
To: Brutzman, Donald (Don) (CIV)
Cc: X3D Graphics Working Group; X3D Graphics public mailing list
Subject: Re: [x3d] X3DUOM and validation of dangling references?

Sorry I wasn’t clear, the problem is the acceptableNodeTypes attribute in X3DUOM.

John

On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 7:52 AM John Carlson <yottzumm at gmail.com> wrote:
X3DVertexAttributeNode and 
FogCoordinate are used, but not defined in V3.0.
 
These are referred to by acceptableNodeTypes in many areas, but do not appear in the model as
Types.
 
I believe the fix may be to remove the acceptableNodeTypes, but not sure.
 
John
 
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
 
From: Brutzman, Donald (Don) (CIV)
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2018 7:47 AM
To: John Carlson
Cc: X3D Graphics Working Group; X3D Graphics public mailing list
Subject: Re: [x3d] X3DUOM and validation of dangling references?
 
On 9/27/2018 10:45 AM, John Carlson wrote:
> Don, my suggested changes to v3.0 unified object model haven’t bee accepted yet?  We need validation on the object model where there are dangling references.
 
Sorry John but am not familiar with this issue.  Was there a prior email, or can you advise further?  Good topic for today's X3D Working Group teleconference if you can attend.
 
                X3D Unified Object Model (X3DUOM)
                http://www.web3d.org/specifications/X3DUOM.html
 
                http://www.web3d.org/specifications/X3dUnifiedObjectModel-4.0.xml
 
all the best, Don
-- 
Don Brutzman  Naval Postgraduate School, Code USW/Br       brutzman at nps.edu
Watkins 270,  MOVES Institute, Monterey CA 93943-5000 USA   +1.831.656.2149
X3D graphics, virtual worlds, navy robotics http://faculty.nps.edu/brutzman
 
 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://web3d.org/pipermail/x3d-public_web3d.org/attachments/20180928/388b6f47/attachment-0001.html>