[x3d-public] X3DPSAIL no need to wrap simple types; PyJNIus issues isolated; work next on native Python package

[John Carlson]

>> Also see minimal.py I suggest we work with the in short term.

>Looks like you changed it... as discussed, use of an invalid fragment and focusing on IS with ProtoInstance leaps right to the more-obscure boundaries of the language.  This raises more questions than answers and is not good for design checks.  If you ever want a super-simple test scene, just excerpt X3D-Scene-Shape-Sphere from HelloWorld.x3d as a minimalist valid model.

Yes, but it’s likely that that simple test scene would pass muster.   What I was trying to do was create an example similar to other failed examples, so we could potentially convert to Java (and add more of the scene) for testing.

Would you like me to remove *.future.py files from GitHub x3dpsail and www.web3d.org/x3d/stylesheets/java/src/python/pyjnius folder?   Also edit xml2all.js to not create the *.future.py files?

John


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://web3d.org/pipermail/x3d-public_web3d.org/attachments/20190706/318b51b9/attachment.html>