[x3d-public] x3dom prototypes, extern proto

[Andreas Plesch]

Thanks for thinking this through. I am not seeing any inconsistencies,
only redundancies which could invite authoring errors in the first
place.

I think for now, x3dom will have to go by the garbage in, garbage out
principle, meaning that inconsistent field statements may cause
problems. The spec. actually requires consistent naming.

On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 10:06 AM Don Brutzman <brutzman at nps.edu> wrote:
>
> Checking ProtoDeclare and ExternProtoDeclare can be tricky, but I think it is correctly defined.
>
> My understanding of the intent of that section was to prevent unexpected errors in the case of
>
> a. ProtoDeclare defined,
> b. ExternProtoDeclare and ProtoInstance example work and are deployed,
> c. ProtoDeclare subsequently adds some additional fields or changes default field values,

How would that happen ? Externally, by editing the ProtoDeclare in the
referenced file ? That would seem like a situation which should not be
in the scope of x3d.

> d. ExternProtoDeclare and ProtoInstance example still work OK though new ProtoDeclare is retrieved at runtime.

Hm, is there a requirement to reload already loaded ProtoDeclare's
when a new ProtoInstance is added to a scene ?

> Certainly the browser loading the original/updated ProtoDeclare must honor the behavior defined therein, including default values.
>
> If the field interfaces within the ExternProtoDeclare (which only contain name, type, accessType and not default values) are different, that would be an error.

yes, exactly, so why have those field interfaces ?

> As above, if default values within the ProtoDeclare change, this has no impact on ExternProtoDeclare field definitions because they do not list default values.

I am not sure how the default values could change.

>
> When a ProtoInstance provides fieldValue initializations, they of course supersede whatever the default might be in the ProtoDeclare.
>
> ... so I think this all hangs together cleanly without contradiction or ambiguity.

Agreed, just potentially confusing redundancy.

>
> Implementation-support notes:
> - InstantReality handles cases well, although console warnings sometimes include false positives.

I am using view3dscene and freeWrl for testing. Most examples work
well though freeWrl seems to have a problem with the nested spin group
prototype example.

> - X3D-Edit has a feature to check ExternProtoDeclare interfaces against ProtoDeclare interfaces.
> - Utility methods for such checking would be a good feature to add to our Java, Python and JavaScript libraries.
>
> Loading and checking for such consistency is typically not performed by any of our Quality Assurance (QA) tools since they tend to perform validations in an offline manner.  For X3DOM, I think this gap in testing coverage means that you should carefully check for consistency because if ProtoDeclare and ExternProtoDeclare differ then an incompatible interface is expected and model errors are likely.
>
> Improvements always welcome.  Thanks for close scrutiny and thanks for tackling this super valuable capability for X3DOM.

You can follow progress here:

https://andreasplesch.github.io/x3dom/test/functional/proto/inline.html#Front

It will be interesting to see how Protos can be used in combination
with web js based templating.

-Andreas

> On 6/23/2020 6:10 PM, Andreas Plesch wrote:
> > ...
> >> The next step would be to support the ExternProtoDeclare statement.
> >> The main question I have is about the function of the additional field
> >> statements under ExternProtoDeclare.
> >>
> >> - Do they replace ProtoInterface field statements ? (No.)
> >> - Is the ProtoInterface element still required in the external file ? (Yes.)
> >> - Are they listed just for convenience (for the author and the browser) ? (Yes?)
> >> - Can they be ignored ? (Yes?)
> >
> > I did find the clause "The names and types of the fields of the
> > interface declaration shall be a subset of those defined in the
> > implementation." in 4.4.5.2 EXTERNPROTO interface semantics. This
> > means that an ExternProto can restrict access to fields by not listing
> > them in its field elements. So they should not be ignored. On the
> > other hand a browser which ignores them would still generate the same
> > behaviour, minus warnings or errors in an ill-constructed scene when a
> > ProtoInstance is trying to set non-accessible fields.
> >
> > So I think as a first cut, it is ok to just load the external
> > Protodeclaration and give it the name of the ExternProto and not doing
> > much or anything with the field elements.
> >
> >> Thanks for any insight,
> >>
> >> -Andreas
> >>
> >> --
> >> Andreas Plesch
> >> Waltham, MA 02453
> >
> > --
> > Andreas Plesch
> > Waltham, MA 02453
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > x3d-public mailing list
> > x3d-public at web3d.org
> > http://web3d.org/mailman/listinfo/x3d-public_web3d.org
> >
>
> all the best, Don
> --
> Don Brutzman  Naval Postgraduate School, Code USW/Br       brutzman at nps.edu
> Watkins 270,  MOVES Institute, Monterey CA 93943-5000 USA   +1.831.656.2149
> X3D graphics, virtual worlds, navy robotics http://faculty.nps.edu/brutzman



--
Andreas Plesch
Waltham, MA 02453