[x3d-public] Priorities

[John Carlson]

If I recall correctly, full support for SAI will require a Browser
implementation.   I suggest someone scope out the work for that, if any.
That is, much of the functionality may be there.  It’s important to
distinguish X_ITE’s Browser from X3DOM’s in any case.

John

On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 9:22 PM John Carlson <yottzumm at gmail.com> wrote:

> Andreas, can you share any info about why field routing may not be working
> for X3DScripts in X3DOM?  See coderextreme repository.
>
> When I get a chance, I will peek at proto declare/interface fields, but my
> understanding is those go away!
>
> Note that I’m not currently working on SAI for X3DOM, but I do have some
> preliminary steps for declaring field types.
>
> John
>
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 6:45 PM Don Brutzman <brutzman at nps.edu> wrote:
>
>> On 10/13/2020 8:26 PM, John Carlson wrote:
>> >
>> > Here’s may be possible:  X3DScript node for X3DOM and  X_ITE.   PROTOs
>> with scripts
>>
>> Script node support is is always topmost deficient.  X3DOM without
>> scripts is not compliant X3D or VRML.
>>
>> Prototypes are tied for importance, as in Really Really Important for X
>> extensibility.
>>
>> Please continue sharing information with Andreas so that this might all
>> land and work.  Thanks John.
>>
>> all the best, Don
>> --
>> Don Brutzman  Naval Postgraduate School, Code USW/Br
>> brutzman at nps.edu
>> Watkins 270,  MOVES Institute, Monterey CA 93943-5000 USA
>>  +1.831.656.2149
>> X3D graphics, virtual worlds, navy robotics
>> http://faculty.nps.edu/brutzman
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://web3d.org/pipermail/x3d-public_web3d.org/attachments/20201014/bbb290fe/attachment-0001.html>