<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink="#954F72"><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal>I forgot what we did to support ProtoInstance under X3DMaterialNode under Appearance. I don’t see much support for ProtoInstance in material fields in Appearance in X3DUOM. Is it valid to have a material which is a ProtoInstance? I need some way of generating it in the JSON schema from X3DUOM.</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>See attached files. Also, run the X3D file through X3DJSAIL and see if it produces similar JSON. I see two differences (ProtoInstance is in an array, containerField is -children instead of -material), but my serializers may be off.</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>$ node ../node/jsondiff.js X3dHeaderPrototypeSyntaxExamples.json X3dHeaderPrototypeSyntaxExamples.new.json</p><p class=MsoNormal>================================================================================</p><p class=MsoNormal>C:\Users\coderextreme\X3DJSONLD\src\main\node\jsondiff.js X3dHeaderPrototypeSynt</p><p class=MsoNormal>axExamples.json X3dHeaderPrototypeSyntaxExamples.new.json</p><p class=MsoNormal>@5 /X3D/Scene/-children/11/Transform/-children/0/Shape/-appearance/Appearance/-m</p><p class=MsoNormal>aterial</p><p class=MsoNormal>< {"ProtoInstance":{"@name":"EmissiveMaterial","fieldValue":[{"@name":"onlyColor</p><p class=MsoNormal>","@value":[0.2,0.6,0.6]}]}}</p><p class=MsoNormal>@7 /X3D/Scene/-children/11/Transform/-children/0/Shape/-appearance/Appearance/-c</p><p class=MsoNormal>hildren</p><p class=MsoNormal>> [{"ProtoInstance":{"@name":"EmissiveMaterial","fieldValue":[{"@name":"onlyColo</p><p class=MsoNormal>r","@value":[0.2,0.6,0.6]}]}}]</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Related Java:</p><p class=MsoNormal> .setMaterial(ProtoInstance2 = new ProtoInstanceObject().setName("EmissiveMaterial")))</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>See, containerField is material. However the ProtoBody has two children, the first is a comment, so -children may be correct???</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Rescue me from my confusion!</p><p class=MsoNormal>John</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></body></html>