<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink="#954F72"><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal>X3DVertexAttributeNode and </p><p class=MsoNormal>FogCoordinate are used, but not defined in V3.0.</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>These are referred to by acceptableNodeTypes in many areas, but do not appear in the model as</p><p class=MsoNormal>Types.</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>I believe the fix may be to remove the acceptableNodeTypes, but not sure.</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>John</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Sent from <a href="https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986">Mail</a> for Windows 10</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div style='mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal style='border:none;padding:0in'><b>From: </b><a href="mailto:brutzman@nps.edu">Brutzman, Donald (Don) (CIV)</a><br><b>Sent: </b>Friday, September 28, 2018 7:47 AM<br><b>To: </b><a href="mailto:yottzumm@gmail.com">John Carlson</a><br><b>Cc: </b><a href="mailto:x3d@web3d.org">X3D Graphics Working Group</a>; <a href="mailto:x3d-public@web3d.org">X3D Graphics public mailing list</a><br><b>Subject: </b>Re: [x3d] X3DUOM and validation of dangling references?</p></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>On 9/27/2018 10:45 AM, John Carlson wrote:</p><p class=MsoNormal>> Don, my suggested changes to v3.0 unified object model haven’t bee accepted yet? We need validation on the object model where there are dangling references.</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Sorry John but am not familiar with this issue. Was there a prior email, or can you advise further? Good topic for today's X3D Working Group teleconference if you can attend.</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal> X3D Unified Object Model (X3DUOM)</p><p class=MsoNormal> http://www.web3d.org/specifications/X3DUOM.html</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal> http://www.web3d.org/specifications/X3dUnifiedObjectModel-4.0.xml</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>all the best, Don</p><p class=MsoNormal>-- </p><p class=MsoNormal>Don Brutzman Naval Postgraduate School, Code USW/Br brutzman@nps.edu</p><p class=MsoNormal>Watkins 270, MOVES Institute, Monterey CA 93943-5000 USA +1.831.656.2149</p><p class=MsoNormal>X3D graphics, virtual worlds, navy robotics http://faculty.nps.edu/brutzman</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></body></html>