<div dir="ltr">Would this ultimately, apply to ALL XML attributes? Need some help here!</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 1:06 PM John Carlson <<a href="mailto:yottzumm@gmail.com">yottzumm@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">I found some suggestions in the standards that one use 
 and 
, but no requirement???<div><br></div><div>The reason I mention this is because in the HAnim motion standard, there's examples that certainly look like a SFStrings that cover more than one line, without newline and carriage return encoding, as above. Plus the Motion interface has joints and channels as "string"s, not "sequence<string>"</div><div><br></div><div>I think the standard is correct, we just need to modify our schemas and X3DUOM to change MFString to SFString for joints and channels, if not already done.</div><div><br></div><div>I think I have heard from at least a couple of people that the standard is correct, but from one person, a negative.</div><div><br></div><div>I am not sure if this is a difference between HTML and XML?</div><div><br></div><div>This is timely, because people are implementing the new HAnim motion standard.</div><div><br></div><div>Comments? Corrections?</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div><br></div><div>John</div></div>
</blockquote></div>