[x3d-public] JSON Encoding - Taking Don's idea one step further

[Roy Walmsley]

Don,

Thanks for the feedback.

I don't think your CON is correct. Remember, it would be like an XML
encoding. So, no additional wrapping. In  fact, it's actually shorter than
your original encoding. My version, 34 lines. Your alternate encoding
version, 42 lines.

Roy

-----Original Message-----
From: Don Brutzman [mailto:brutzman at nps.edu] 
Sent: 21 December 2015 20:20
To: Roy Walmsley; John Carlson
Cc: x3d-public at web3d.org
Subject: Re: JSON Encoding - Taking Don's idea one step further

pretty interesting!

not sure it is a complete rewrite at all, but it is different.  additional
pros/cons:

CON: when "-children" not already present, it does add yet-another layer of
wrapping around child nodes.
PRO: lossless round-trip conversions possible, since order is preserved.

all the best, Don
-- 
Don Brutzman  Naval Postgraduate School, Code USW/Br       brutzman at nps.edu
Watkins 270,  MOVES Institute, Monterey CA 93943-5000 USA   +1.831.656.2149
X3D graphics, virtual worlds, navy robotics http://faculty.nps.edu/brutzman