[x3d-public] Proposal amendment: implicit fields in x3dv

[Yves Piguet]

Le 30 août 2016 à 16:30, doug sanden a écrit :

>> The containerField of a PROTO is the containerField of the first node of its body.
> You sure this will work for protos with multiple rootnodes? 

Yes, I think so. Have you found a counterexample? Should there really be a problem, one could add an exception. Implicit field names would be a convenience, nothing more.

It shouldn't be different than the default containerField attribute in XML encoding, but I can't find where it's specified for prototypes.

Thanks,

Yves