[x3d-public] Action Needed: Need for acceptableStatements (or types) for children fields in X3DObject Model
Don Brutzman
brutzman at nps.edu
Sat Jul 29 17:20:16 PDT 2017
On 7/29/2017 4:58 PM, John Carlson wrote:
> Thank you for your analysis Don. I did add X3DChildNode as a parent of all statements, but apparently this was incorrect, so I removed it? Please let me know. If X3DChildNode is not the parent of all statements, there needs to a distinguishing in the object model.
Some statements are document related and do not appear within the 3d model itself: X3D head component meta unit Scene.
ProtoInstance might not be in the "-children" field since it can have a variety of node types.
These and other idiosyncrasies should be covered in the existing XML schema/DTD, JSON schema and X3DJSAIL design.
all the best, Don
--
Don Brutzman Naval Postgraduate School, Code USW/Br brutzman at nps.edu
Watkins 270, MOVES Institute, Monterey CA 93943-5000 USA +1.831.656.2149
X3D graphics, virtual worlds, navy robotics http://faculty.nps.edu/brutzman
More information about the x3d-public
mailing list