[x3d-public] Action Needed: Need for acceptableStatements (or types)forchildren fields in X3DObject Model
Don Brutzman
brutzman at nps.edu
Sat Jul 29 18:53:01 PDT 2017
On 7/29/2017 6:42 PM, John Carlson wrote:
> I also question whether all ConcreteNodes should be X3DChildNodes. I doubt it. What do you think?
no
> If I take it out, what will break? Frankly, I just threw X3DChildNode in there hoping it would fix something that was broken. A more principled approach would be better—get the whole inheritance hierarchy into OM4X3D.
>
> I will soon remove all references to X3DChildNode in my code and continue testing. We will see what happens.
>
> John
I'll be surprised if you find something broken... the X3DJSAIL adaptation of has been tested on the entire X3D Examples Archive.
Authoritative reference throughout: X3D Abstract Spec.
all the best, Don
--
Don Brutzman Naval Postgraduate School, Code USW/Br brutzman at nps.edu
Watkins 270, MOVES Institute, Monterey CA 93943-5000 USA +1.831.656.2149
X3D graphics, virtual worlds, navy robotics http://faculty.nps.edu/brutzman
More information about the x3d-public
mailing list