[x3d-public] Action Needed: Need for acceptableStatements (or types)forchildren fields in X3DObject Model

Don Brutzman brutzman at nps.edu
Sat Jul 29 18:53:01 PDT 2017


On 7/29/2017 6:42 PM, John Carlson wrote:
> I also question whether all ConcreteNodes should be X3DChildNodes.  I doubt it.  What do you think?

no

> If I take it out, what will break?  Frankly, I just threw X3DChildNode in there hoping it would fix something that was broken.  A more principled approach would be better—get the whole inheritance hierarchy into OM4X3D.
> 
> I will soon remove all references to X3DChildNode in my code and continue testing.  We will see what happens.
> 
> John
I'll be surprised if you find something broken... the X3DJSAIL adaptation of has been tested on the entire X3D Examples Archive.

Authoritative reference throughout: X3D Abstract Spec.

all the best, Don
-- 
Don Brutzman  Naval Postgraduate School, Code USW/Br       brutzman at nps.edu
Watkins 270,  MOVES Institute, Monterey CA 93943-5000 USA   +1.831.656.2149
X3D graphics, virtual worlds, navy robotics http://faculty.nps.edu/brutzman



More information about the x3d-public mailing list