[x3d-public] Discussion: containerField for x3d.py XML export
John Carlson
yottzumm at gmail.com
Sun Sep 24 14:14:53 PDT 2023
Note that I’ve also added a way to print out HAnimHumanoid joints field to
x3d.py
Here the python with skeleton field
https://www.web3d.org/x3d/content/examples/HumanoidAnimation/Specifications/KoreanCharacterMotionAnnexD01Jin.py
Convert this to XML, I guess, or I will provide other XML later. You’ll
want to add a joints field for testing purposes.
Also print out VRML and make sure it works.
The goal is no warnings.
Thanks!
John
On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 3:58 PM John Carlson <yottzumm at gmail.com> wrote:
> I suggest taking the HAnim pt2 annex D .x3d example, here,
>
> https://www.web3d.org/x3d/content/examples/HumanoidAnimation/Specifications/KoreanCharacterMotionAnnexD01JinIndex.html
> convert to Python .py then convert the python to XML by editing the python
> program, write out the XML to .x3d . Then load the .x3d into view3dscene.
>
> Btw, sourceforge x3d code is locked down again.
>
> John
> On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 3:39 PM John Carlson <yottzumm at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If it wasn’t clear, i was going to add a “containerField” optional
>> parameter to some XML() methods in x3d.py
>>
>> I put in containerField into where view3dscene complains and the problem
>> goes away, I know exactly what the problem is. I will provide a file
>> later, sorry for the delay.
>>
>> The goal is to do no editing except for meta statements.
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 2:47 PM Brutzman, Donald (Don) (CIV) <
>> brutzman at nps.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for continued troubleshooting.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Please do not do anything with containerField handling in x3d.py since
>>> it is unique to XML encoding.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> If you encounter any incorrect handling, please provide a regular issue
>>> report that notes
>>>
>>> - Model, in .x3d/.x3dv and also .py
>>> - Error or warning that was encountered, relevant tools, etc.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I can then isolate the problem and fix it. When errors do occur, it is
>>> usually an error in the scene, but sometimes a simple omission of some sort
>>> somewhere deep in the code autogeneration of the library.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> p.s. also thanks for your recent issue reports on X3DJSAIL, very
>>> helpful. I have made a number of improvements this weekend, hoping to
>>> publish tonight.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> all the best, Don
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Don Brutzman Naval Postgraduate School, Code USW/Br
>>> brutzman at nps.edu
>>>
>>> Watkins 270, MOVES Institute, Monterey CA 93943-5000 USA
>>> +1.831.656.2149
>>>
>>> X3D graphics, virtual worlds, navy robotics
>>> https://faculty.nps.edu/brutzman
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* John Carlson <yottzumm at gmail.com>
>>> *Sent:* Sunday, September 24, 2023 11:34 AM
>>> *To:* Brutzman, Donald (Don) (CIV) <brutzman at nps.edu>; Michalis
>>> Kamburelis <michalis.kambi at gmail.com>; Peitso, Loren (CIV) <
>>> lepeitso at nps.edu>; X3D Graphics public mailing list <
>>> x3d-public at web3d.org>
>>> *Subject:* Discussion: containerField for x3d.py XML export
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> First of all, great work on x3d.py, Loren and Don, I feel like I am
>>> polishing a diamond.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I am considering adding the containerField attribute (not field) to XML
>>> output in x3d.py. This is mainly to support requirements of view3dscene.
>>> It complains if I don’t add the containerField attributes in HAnim
>>> (skeleton and joints containerFields, maybe more)—the default, children, is
>>> not an acceptable to view3dscene. Also, not having a skin containerField
>>> is weird when dropping arbitrary Shape nodes into a HAnimHumanoid.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Does adding the containerField attribute seem like a good idea, or
>>> should I push back on browser vendors?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I plan to do something like I do for VRML when printing out joints and
>>> skeleton fields etc. I won’t print out the containerField for obvious
>>> fields, i have a list of these somewhere…geometry, appearance, material,
>>> etc
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Should I allow the x3d.py app programmer to add a containerField
>>> attribute, or should I compute it as best i can, and save browser vendors
>>> the pain?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I think what this means is passing an optional parameter to some
>>> each.XML() method calls.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> After writing this message, the answer seems obvious.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Comments?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://web3d.org/pipermail/x3d-public_web3d.org/attachments/20230924/73681e12/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the x3d-public
mailing list