[x3d-public] X3D 4.0 specification problem: upVector field for TextureProjector, TextureProjectorParallel

[John Carlson]

Interesting, I view fieldOfView like 2 SFVec2f.  Which is best in higher
dimensions?  MFVec2f?

John
On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 1:31 PM Holger Seelig via x3d-public <
x3d-public at web3d.org> wrote:

> I just realised that TextureProjectorparallel.fieldOfView is of type
> SFVec4f, but OrthoViewpoint.fieldOfView is of type MFFloat.
>
> Which of the two is better?
>
> OrthoViewpoint is definitely older.
>
> I think of SFVec4f as a mathematical 4d vector.
>
>
> https://www.web3d.org/documents/specifications/19775-1/V4.0/Part01/components/textureProjection.html#TextureProjectorParallel
>
> https://www.web3d.org/documents/specifications/19775-1/V4.0/Part01/components/navigation.html#OrthoViewpoint
>
> Best regards,
> Holger
>
> --
> Holger Seelig
> Leipzig, Germany
>
> holger.seelig at yahoo.de
> https://create3000.github.io/x_ite/
>
> Am 08.12.2024 um 05:21 schrieb Brutzman, Donald (Don) (CIV) via x3d-public
> <x3d-public at web3d.org>:
>
> However
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> x3d-public mailing list
> x3d-public at web3d.org
> http://web3d.org/mailman/listinfo/x3d-public_web3d.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://web3d.org/pipermail/x3d-public_web3d.org/attachments/20241213/2885a2aa/attachment.html>