[x3d-public] draft X3D 4.1 prose for font files and libraries

[John Carlson]

Also X_ITE.
https://create3000.github.io/x_ite/components/texturing3d/imagetextureatlas/

John

On Fri, Mar 7, 2025 at 5:36 PM John Carlson <yottzumm at gmail.com> wrote:

> https://doc.x3dom.org/author/Texturing/ImageTextureAtlas.html
>
> ???
>
> It appears X3DOM specific???
>
> John
>
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2025 at 4:59 PM Joe D Williams <joedwil at earthlink.net>
> wrote:
>
>> > I'm not seeing ImageTexture.url networking separate from ImageTexture
>> presentation?
>>
>>
>>
>> We do that with ImageAtlas, I think I saw, where the ImageAtlas is a DEF,
>> then texture is referenced by USE for mapping to several independent Shape
>> Appearance nodes.
>>
>> Joe
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Extensible 3D (X3D) Graphics public discussion <
>> x3d-public at web3d.org>
>> Sent: Mar 7, 2025 12:14 PM
>> To: Extensible 3D (X3D) Graphics public discussion <x3d-public at web3d.org>
>> Cc: John Carlson <yottzumm at gmail.com>, Andreas Plesch <
>> andreasplesch at gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: [x3d-public] draft X3D 4.1 prose for font files and libraries
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 7, 2025 at 1:33 PM Brutzman, Donald (Don) (CIV) via
>> x3d-public <x3d-public at web3d.org> wrote:
>>
>>> separation of concerns, i.e. keeping url networking separate from
>>> FontStyle presentation,  not overwhelming FontStyle functionality.  Thus,
>>> FontStyle.*url *is simply incomplete design, and FontStyle.*fontLibrary
>>> *is a more-correct alternative, if we want font scope limited to a
>>> single FontStyle node.
>>>
>>
>> I don't understand why the same argument doesn't also apply to
>> ImageTexture.  I'm not seeing ImageTexture.url networking separate from
>> ImageTexture presentation?  Do we need an ImageLibrary?
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://web3d.org/pipermail/x3d-public_web3d.org/attachments/20250307/e45656af/attachment.html>