[x3d-public] draft X3D 4.1 prose for font files and libraries
John Carlson
yottzumm at gmail.com
Fri Mar 14 08:26:17 PDT 2025
Or alternatively, provide a cssStyle attribute/field. Another idea would
be to add a css class in the family field???
Maybe one could support both FontStyle.url and css support?
Hmm!
John
On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 10:12 AM John Carlson <yottzumm at gmail.com> wrote:
> I don’t have a clue on why FontStyle.url is insufficient, except that some
> font urls have more than one font.
>
> Perhaps all that is needed is providing more values to existing FontStyle
> fields, and gracefully hide most of the ugly, complicated stuff. Perhaps
> it would be best to provide a registry of fonts separate from the
> standards? Maybe even with component levels?
>
> Really, this conversation started with me asking about CSS fonts. How
> about adding CSS styles to FontStyle??? That is, provide a way to include
> a CSS file, perhaps with Inline? Or just use existing style attribute?
>
> Hmm!
>
> John
>
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 5:41 AM Michalis Kamburelis via x3d-public <
> x3d-public at web3d.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> I still have not heard a convincing argument why a more
>> straightforward "FontStyle.url" was rejected. "FontStyle.url" seems
>> like a straightforward solution that avoids all the pitfalls of
>> "FontLibrary", because the association between FontStyle <-> font file
>> is just explicit.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://web3d.org/pipermail/x3d-public_web3d.org/attachments/20250314/00d05bcf/attachment.html>
More information about the x3d-public
mailing list