[x3d-public] Volume rendering spec.

[Andreas Plesch]

Ok, that's perfect. Thanks, Andreas

On Jan 10, 2018 5:41 PM, "Roy Walmsley" <roy.walmsley at ntlworld.com> wrote:

> Hi Andreas,
>
>
>
> I have checked and can tell you that this issue has already been noted.
> For reference it is Mantis issue 916. This comment was:
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Subject: misnamed nodes and incorrect field in support table
>
> 1. "X3DVolumeNode" needs to corrected as "X3DVolumeDataNode"
>
> 2. "CompositeVolumeStyle" (entry in level 3) needs to corrected as
> "ComposedVolumeStyle".
>
> 3. ComposedVolumeStyle entry at level 3 indicates: "ordered field is
> always treated as FALSE. All other fields fully supported."
>
> However there is no "ordered" field, and so this line should be rewritten
> as "All fields fully supported."
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------
>
>
>
> All three of the points noted will be corrected as submitted.
>
>
>
> There are no current plans to introduce an ‘ordered’ field. If you think
> that is desirable, then it would be appropriate to raise a specification
> comment.
>
>
>
> All the best,
>
>
>
> Roy
>
>
>
> *From:* x3d-public [mailto:x3d-public-bounces at web3d.org] *On Behalf Of *Andreas
> Plesch
> *Sent:* 10 January 2018 18:01
> *To:* X3D Graphics public mailing list <x3d-public at web3d.org>
> *Subject:* [x3d-public] Volume rendering spec.
>
>
>
> Before I submit a spec. comment I would like to explore if there are more
> appropriate resolutions to the following issues:
>
>
>
> Table 41.7 ( http://www.web3d.org/documents/specifications/19775-1/V3.3/
> Part01/components/volume.html#t-supportlevels ) lists
> CompositeVolumeStyle in level 3. However, a style with this name is not
> defined in the Volume Rendering component. There is a ComposedVolumeStyle
> but this style is a level 2 style in the table.
>
>
>
> A proposed resolution is to remove the row which lists
> CompositeVolumeStyle from Table 41.7
>
>
> Table 41.7 refers to an ordered field in the support column for
> ComposedVolumeStyle. However, the node signature at section 41.4.4 (
> http://www.web3d.org/documents/specifications/19775-1/V3.3/
> Part01/components/volume.html#ComposedVolumeStyle ) does not have an
> ordered field.
>
>
>
> A proposed resolution is to replace the comment in the support column for
> ComposedVolumeStyle with 'All fields fully supported'.
>
>
>
> Alternatively, it is possible that there used to be an ordered field and
> that it should be reintroduced. Then level 3 would support this field.
>
>
>
> Andreas
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://web3d.org/pipermail/x3d-public_web3d.org/attachments/20180110/93cbf1ef/attachment-0001.html>