[x3d-public] X3D minutes 22 JAN 2021: specification editors review/commits

[Don Brutzman]

Yes thanks for requesting clarification John, that is where we landed today.  We will keep the same numbering that is on the current diagram [8.2].

On 1/25/2021 12:47 PM, John Carlson wrote:
> 
> I don’t know if renumbering is a good idea, it would mess up web searches?
> 
> John
> 
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 2:35 PM Don Brutzman <brutzman at nps.edu <mailto:brutzman at nps.edu>> wrote:
>     Specification editors met today, reviewed next steps, and made some of the changes.
> [...]
>      > [8.2]    X3D Graphics Standards Relationships
>      > https://www.web3d.org/specifications/X3dSpecificationRelationships.png <https://www.web3d.org/specifications/X3dSpecificationRelationships.png>
> 
>     h. Dick noted long trail of ISO paperwork already in place with prior numbering, and that the existing numbering scheme doesn't affect priority/sequencing.
> 
>     Will keep current numbering scheme (not the same as that above) and have revision for next week.

all the best, Don
-- 
Don Brutzman  Naval Postgraduate School, Code USW/Br       brutzman at nps.edu
Watkins 270,  MOVES Institute, Monterey CA 93943-5000 USA   +1.831.656.2149
X3D graphics, virtual worlds, navy robotics http://faculty.nps.edu/brutzman