[x3d-public] Mantis? No SceneGraphStructureStatement AbstractNodeType present in old X3D3 versions, X3DUOM

[John Carlson]

Hmm.  I mean IS field in fieldValue in X3DUOM.   I guess X3DUOM updates are
postponed until X3D4 is done.

John

On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 12:28 PM John Carlson <yottzumm at gmail.com> wrote:

> As previously reported, I am fairly sure I added an IS node (which creates
> a setIS method).   I don’t think I checked any of this in.
>
> I haven’t formally tested  JSON schema that I remember.
>
> John
>
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 9:38 PM John Carlson <yottzumm at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I just discovered this draft.   Sorry for the delay.  I think the primary
>> goal should be the alignment of the statement type hierarchy between X3D3
>> and X3D4.
>>
>> I’m wondering if my changes locally affected fieldValue.setIS as
>> previously reported?  Or fieldValue.addChild(new IS()) (IS is not a node)
>>
>> I am thinking someone should look at the type hierarchy differences for
>> statements. If we go with X3D4, I will upgrade various examples.
>>
>> I guess the other solution is to provide different jars for X3D3 versus
>> X3D4.
>>
>> John
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 4:09 PM John Carlson <yottzumm at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm still having to back out updates to X3DUOM:
>>>
>>> $ grep SceneGraphStructureStatement X3dUnifiedObjectModel*|sort -u
>>> X3dUnifiedObjectModel-3.0.xml:            <Inheritance
>>> baseType="SceneGraphStructureStatement"/>
>>> X3dUnifiedObjectModel-3.1.xml:            <Inheritance
>>> baseType="SceneGraphStructureStatement"/>
>>> X3dUnifiedObjectModel-3.2.xml:            <Inheritance
>>> baseType="SceneGraphStructureStatement"/>
>>> X3dUnifiedObjectModel-3.3.xml:            <Inheritance
>>> baseType="SceneGraphStructureStatement"/>
>>>
>>> Here's what's in the old X3D3 versions, but not 4.0:
>>>
>>>        <AbstractNodeType name="SceneGraphStructureStatement">
>>>           <InterfaceDefinition
>>> specificationUrl="
>>> https://www.web3d.org/documents/specifications/19775-1/V3.3/Part01/concepts.html#scenegraph
>>> "
>>> appinfo="SceneGraphStructureStatement is a marker interface that
>>> identifies statements relating to nonrenderable scene graph structure.
>>> SceneGraphStructureStatement does not extend from any other node type
>>> since it is not an explicit part of the X3D node interface hierarchy,
>>> and DEF/USE is not appropriate for such statements.">
>>>              <componentInfo name="Core" level="1"/>
>>>              <field name="class"
>>>                     type="SFString"
>>>                     accessType="inputOutput"
>>>                     baseType="xs:NMTOKENS"
>>>                     description="The class attribute on each X3D node
>>> and statement is a space-separated list of classes, reserved for use by
>>> Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) and XML stylesheets."/>
>>>           </InterfaceDefinition>
>>>        </AbstractNodeType>
>>>
>>>
>>> I am proceeding to delete the Inheritance nodes from my  versions 3
>>> X3DUOM. There are some "AdditionalInheritance" elements that may need to
>>> be converted over to "Inheritance."
>>>
>>> If you want me to proceed with updating X3DUOM and AdditionalInheritance
>>> on sourceforge.net, let me know, but that's treading on unknown
>>> territory for me, updating the stuff that creates X3DUOM.  I assume this
>>> means updating XML schema versions 3.  Is there a Mantis issue yet? I am
>>> capable of filing one, I hope.
>>>
>>> I am not currently testing anything that uses X3DUOM besides my own
>>> stuff. Mostly, I am just trying to get the JSON schema working.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://web3d.org/pipermail/x3d-public_web3d.org/attachments/20210907/0fbdcac5/attachment-0001.html>