[x3d-public] draft X3D 4.1 prose for font files and libraries

[Joe D Williams]

> I'm not seeing ImageTexture.url networking separate from ImageTexture presentation? 

We do that with ImageAtlas, I think I saw, where the ImageAtlas is a DEF, then texture is referenced by USE for mapping to several independent Shape Appearance nodes. 
Joe
-----Original Message-----
From: Extensible 3D (X3D) Graphics public discussion <x3d-public at web3d.org>
Sent: Mar 7, 2025 12:14 PM
To: Extensible 3D (X3D) Graphics public discussion <x3d-public at web3d.org>
Cc: John Carlson <yottzumm at gmail.com>, Andreas Plesch <andreasplesch at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [x3d-public] draft X3D 4.1 prose for font files and libraries

 

On Fri, Mar 7, 2025 at 1:33 PM Brutzman, Donald (Don) (CIV) via x3d-public <x3d-public at web3d.org (mailto:x3d-public at web3d.org)> wrote:
separation of concerns, i.e. keeping url networking separate from FontStyle presentation,  not overwhelming FontStyle functionality.  Thus, FontStyle.url is simply incomplete design, and FontStyle.fontLibrary is a more-correct alternative, if we want font scope limited to a single FontStyle node.


 
I don't understand why the same argument doesn't also apply to ImageTexture.  I'm not seeing ImageTexture.url networking separate from ImageTexture presentation?  Do we need an ImageLibrary?
 
John




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://web3d.org/pipermail/x3d-public_web3d.org/attachments/20250307/1185c39f/attachment-0001.html>