[x3d-public] draft X3D 4.1 prose for font files and libraries

John Carlson yottzumm at gmail.com
Fri Mar 7 15:33:46 PST 2025


Can you give me a link?

Thanks,

John

On Fri, Mar 7, 2025 at 4:59 PM Joe D Williams <joedwil at earthlink.net> wrote:

> > I'm not seeing ImageTexture.url networking separate from ImageTexture
> presentation?
>
>
>
> We do that with ImageAtlas, I think I saw, where the ImageAtlas is a DEF,
> then texture is referenced by USE for mapping to several independent Shape
> Appearance nodes.
>
> Joe
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Extensible 3D (X3D) Graphics public discussion <x3d-public at web3d.org
> >
> Sent: Mar 7, 2025 12:14 PM
> To: Extensible 3D (X3D) Graphics public discussion <x3d-public at web3d.org>
> Cc: John Carlson <yottzumm at gmail.com>, Andreas Plesch <
> andreasplesch at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [x3d-public] draft X3D 4.1 prose for font files and libraries
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2025 at 1:33 PM Brutzman, Donald (Don) (CIV) via x3d-public
> <x3d-public at web3d.org> wrote:
>
>> separation of concerns, i.e. keeping url networking separate from
>> FontStyle presentation,  not overwhelming FontStyle functionality.  Thus,
>> FontStyle.*url *is simply incomplete design, and FontStyle.*fontLibrary *is
>> a more-correct alternative, if we want font scope limited to a single
>> FontStyle node.
>>
>
> I don't understand why the same argument doesn't also apply to
> ImageTexture.  I'm not seeing ImageTexture.url networking separate from
> ImageTexture presentation?  Do we need an ImageLibrary?
>
> John
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://web3d.org/pipermail/x3d-public_web3d.org/attachments/20250307/1075f52f/attachment.html>


More information about the x3d-public mailing list