[x3d-public] HAnim Schematron output sampled

[John Carlson]

Table fixed (had extra l):

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-nCid9PQCADgsTFzZOWUwKd_tNgn3yEMT17CwF0SnhA/edit?usp=sharing

Let's try to work on this document for clarity, and share link to group.

On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 1:53 PM John Carlson <yottzumm at gmail.com> wrote:

> Joint
>
>
>
>
> Incorrect parent/correct sibling
>
> correct parent
>
> vl5
>
>
>
> sacroiliac
>
> humanoid_root
>
> l_sternoclavicular
>
> vc7 (LOA4), vc4 (LOA2--have only checked hierarchy diagram, may be correct
> in schema)
>
> vt1
>
> r|_sternoclavicular
>
> vc7 (LOA4), vc4 (LOA2--have only checked hierarchy diagram, may be correct
> in schema)
>
> vt1
>
> LOA2 hierarchy diagram has a different sibling, but the right parent for
> the latter two. Since I am not based on schema, schematron or X3DUOM, I
> don't have to accommodate this.
>
> I am doing LOA4.
>
> LOA4 and LOA2 pictures included, highlighting areas where there was
> confusion.
>
> Please read back your understanding.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 12:09 PM Brutzman, Donald (Don) (CIV) <
> brutzman at nps.edu> wrote:
>
>> Sounds like progress, but not quite focused enough to make any fixes
>> yet…. Clarity his critical.
>>
>> Hopefully you guys can create a simple list consisting of simple triplets:
>>
>>    - suspect joint or segment name,
>>    - the incorrect parent described in the X3D XML schema,, and
>>    - the correct parent shown by the diagrams in the specifications.
>>
>>
>> If there is such a simple list of a few names/errors/corrections
>> available, I hope to have some time Monday or Tuesday afternoon to work on
>> it together.  Onward…
>>
>> v/r Don
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* Joseph D Williams <joedwil at earthlink.net>
>> *Sent:* Saturday, January 21, 2023 11:07:06 PM
>> *To:* John Carlson <yottzumm at gmail.com>; Brutzman, Donald (Don) (CIV) <
>> brutzman at nps.edu>; X3D Graphics public mailing list <x3d-public at web3d.org
>> >
>> *Subject:* RE: HAnim Schematron output sampled
>>
>>
>> NPS WARNING: *external sender* verify before acting.
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The expected ones are not correct.  Vl5 is a child of root and sternos
>> and vc7 are childs of vt1. The schematron claims are wrong.
>>
>> The schematron is wrong according to the Concepts 4 diagrams for loa3 and
>> loa4.
>>
>>
>>
>>    - Yes, vl5 is a child of sacroiliac, according to Joe.
>>     X3DUOM/schematron wins!
>>
>>
>>
>> No, vl5 is a child of root. Schematron is wrong.
>>
>> The diagrams are correct.
>>
>> Joe
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *John Carlson <yottzumm at gmail.com>
>> *Sent: *Sunday, January 15, 2023 5:46 PM
>> *To: *Joe D Williams <joedwil at earthlink.net>; Don Brutzman
>> <brutzman at nps.edu>; X3D Graphics public mailing list
>> <x3d-public at web3d.org>
>> *Subject: *Re: HAnim Schematron output sampled
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> vl5 has parent humanoid_root rather than expected sacroiliac.  Yes, vl5
>> is a child of sacroiliac, according to Joe.   X3DUOM/schematron wins!
>>
>> l_sternoclavicular has parent vt1 rather than expected vc7.  Please
>> confirm.
>>
>> r_sternoclavicular has parent vt1 rather than expected vc7.  Please
>> confirm.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://web3d.org/pipermail/x3d-public_web3d.org/attachments/20230122/2025f722/attachment.html>